Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dominic Caldwell's avatar

This is sharp work, Muju — I share the instinct to treat infrastructure as battlefield, not backdrop. Where I’d offer a tweak is in how we name the enemy. “Technological sovereignty” is the right rallying cry, but what we’re really facing isn’t Marxist allocation or Zionist narrative dominance. It’s something more banal and more corrosive: surveillance capitalism.

The danger isn’t only that Microsoft or Meta build panopticons. It’s that the logic of surveillance liquefies every domain — health, money, speech, even our capacity for resistance — into behavioral futures markets. That’s what makes the system harder to fight than classic authoritarianism. Franco needed police. Palantir only needs your phone.

And paradoxically, because pluralism is profitable, surveillance capitalism is also the only form of surveillance compatible with prosperity. Which is why the fight isn’t to abolish it (we can’t), but to discipline it inside rule-of-law systems before it disciplines us into compliance. More here in case you are interested. https://dominiccaldwell.substack.com/p/surveillance-capitalism-is-our-only

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts